- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- MA270U vs VP2776T-4K
BenQ MA270U vs ViewSonic VP2776T-4K
What MA270U does better (2) and where VP2776T-4K wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.3Screen8.2
4.1Colour accuracy7.6
6.8Connectivity2.9
5.0Design & ergonomics5.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
MA270UVP2776T-4K
| MA270U | VP2776T-4K | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 560 mm | 450.4 mm | +109.6 mm |
| Width | 614 mm | 613.7 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Depth | 220 mm | 234 mm | −14 mm |
| Weight | 8.2 kg | 7.6 kg | +0.6 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MA270U better than VP2776T-4K?
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W vs 15 W6×
- Refresh rate76 Hz vs 60 Hz+27%
Why is VP2776T-4K better than MA270U?
- Contrast ratio (static)1,200:1 vs 2,000:1+67%
- DCI-P3 coverage95% vs 98%+3%
- Weight8.2 kg vs 7.6 kg+8%
- Height adjustment115 mm vs 120 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 27″ | 27″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 163 ppi | 163 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 76 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 400 nits | 400 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,200:1 | 2,000:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 99% | 100% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 95% | 98% |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | 10 bit |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 90 W | 15 W |
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | — | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | — |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 115 mm | 120 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | Yes |
| Swivel | Yes | Yes |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | — |
| Weight | 8.2 kg | 7.6 kg |
| Width | 614 mm | 614 mm |
| Height | 560 mm | 450 mm |
| Depth | 220 mm | 234 mm |
| Product line | BenQ MA | — |
