- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- MA320U vs PD3205UA
BenQ MA320U vs BenQ PD3205UA
What MA320U does better (6) and where PD3205UA wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
MA320UPD3205UA
| MA320U | PD3205UA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 609 mm | 731 mm | −122 mm |
| Width | 714 mm | 715 mm | −1 mm |
| Depth | 220 mm | 459 mm | −239 mm |
| Weight | 9.1 kg | 10.1 kg | −1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MA320U better than PD3205UA?
- Brightness (typical)550 nits vs 250 nits2.2×
- HDRDisplayHDR 600 vs HDR10
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Contrast ratio (static)1,300:1 vs 1,000:1+30%
- Refresh rate76 Hz vs 60 Hz+27%
- Weight9.1 kg vs 10.1 kg+11%
Why is PD3205UA better than MA320U?
PD3205UA has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 31.5″ | 31.5″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 140 ppi | 140 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 76 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 550 nits | 250 nits |
| Peak brightness (HDR) | 600 nits | — |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,300:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 99% | 99% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 97% | — |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | — |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 600 | HDR10 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 90 W | 90 W |
| KVM switch | — | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| DisplayPort inputs | — | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 115 mm | — |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | Yes |
| Swivel | Yes | — |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | — |
| Weight | 9.1 kg | 10.1 kg |
| Width | 714 mm | 715 mm |
| Height | 609 mm | 731 mm |
| Depth | 220 mm | 459 mm |
| Product line | BenQ MA | — |
