How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. MA320U vs UltraFine 32UQ850

BenQ MA320U vs LG UltraFine 32UQ850

What MA320U does better (4) and where UltraFine 32UQ850 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

BenQ MA320U
BenQ · 2024MA320U
7.4Score
4 advantages≈ $640
Higher score
vs
LG UltraFine 32UQ850
7.2Score
2 advantages≈ $540
8.5Screen7.5
6.8Connectivity5.8
4.0Design & ergonomics4.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

MA320UUltraFine 32UQ850
714 × 609220715 × 598239
MA320UUltraFine 32UQ850Difference
Height609 mm598 mm+11 mm
Width714 mm715 mm−1 mm
Depth220 mm239 mm−19 mm
Weight9.1 kg7.2 kg+1.9 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MA320U better than UltraFine 32UQ850?

  1. Brightness (typical)550 nits vs 400 nits+38%
  2. HDRDisplayHDR 600 vs DisplayHDR 400
  3. Refresh rate76 Hz vs 60 Hz+27%
  4. Height adjustment115 mm vs 110 mm+5%

Why is UltraFine 32UQ850 better than MA320U?

  1. Contrast ratio (static)1,300:1 vs 2,000:1+54%
  2. Weight9.1 kg vs 7.2 kg+26%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ MA320UBenQ MA320U≈ $6407.4
Display
Screen size31.5″31.5″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density140 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate76 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)550 nits400 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)600 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)1,300:12,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage99%—
DCI-P3 coverage97%98%
Colour depth10 bit—
HDRDisplayHDR 600DisplayHDR 400
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W90 W
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs—1
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment115 mm110 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYes—
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight9.1 kg7.2 kg
Width714 mm715 mm
Height609 mm598 mm
Depth220 mm239 mm
Product lineBenQ MALG UltraFine
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare