How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. MA320U vs UltraSharp U4323QE

BenQ MA320U vs Dell UltraSharp U4323QE

What MA320U does better (5) and where UltraSharp U4323QE wins (1) — every spec side by side.

BenQ MA320U
BenQ · 2024MA320U
7.5Score
5 advantages≈ $710
Higher score
vs
Dell UltraSharp U4323QE
Dell · 2023UltraSharp U4323QE
6.9Score
1 advantage≈ $1,000
8.6Screen4.6
6.9Connectivity8.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

MA320UUltraSharp U4323QE
714 × 609220967 × 655256
MA320UUltraSharp U4323QEDifference
Height609 mm655 mm−46 mm
Width714 mm967 mm−253 mm
Depth220 mm256 mm−36 mm
Weight9.1 kg18.6 kg−9.5 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MA320U better than UltraSharp U4323QE?

  1. Pixel density140 ppi vs 104 ppi+35%
  2. Brightness (typical)550 nits vs 350 nits+57%
  3. Weight9.1 kg vs 18.55 kg2×
  4. Contrast ratio (static)1,300:1 vs 1,000:1+30%
  5. sRGB coverage99% vs 95%+4%

Why is UltraSharp U4323QE better than MA320U?

  1. Screen size31.5″ vs 42.5″+35%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ MA320UBenQ MA320U≈ $7107.5
Display
Screen size31.5″42.5″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density140 ppi104 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate76 Hz76 Hz
Brightness (typical)550 nits350 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)600 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)1,300:11,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage99%95%
DCI-P3 coverage97%—
Colour depth10 bit—
HDRDisplayHDR 600—
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W90 W
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs—2
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment115 mm—
Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes—
SwivelYes—
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight9.1 kg18.55 kg
Width714 mm967 mm
Height609 mm655 mm
Depth220 mm256 mm
Product lineBenQ MA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare