How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. MA320U vs UltraFine 32UN880K

BenQ MA320U vs LG UltraFine 32UN880K

What MA320U does better (7) and where UltraFine 32UN880K wins (1) — every spec side by side.

BenQ MA320U
BenQ · 2024MA320U
7.4Score
7 advantages≈ $640
Higher score
vs
LG UltraFine 32UN880K
5.4Score
1 advantage≈ $410
8.5Screen6.4
6.8Connectivity3.4
4.0Design & ergonomics4.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

MA320UUltraFine 32UN880K
714 × 609220714 × 641407
MA320UUltraFine 32UN880KDifference
Height609 mm641 mm−32 mm
Width714 mm714 mm=
Depth220 mm407 mm−187 mm
Weight9.1 kg10.3 kg−1.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MA320U better than UltraFine 32UN880K?

  1. Brightness (typical)550 nits vs 350 nits+57%
  2. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W vs 60 W+50%
  3. HDRDisplayHDR 600 vs HDR10
  4. DCI-P3 coverage97% vs 95%+2%
  5. Contrast ratio (static)1,300:1 vs 1,000:1+30%
  6. Refresh rate76 Hz vs 61 Hz+25%
  7. Weight9.1 kg vs 10.3 kg+13%

Why is UltraFine 32UN880K better than MA320U?

  1. Height adjustment115 mm vs 130 mm+13%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ MA320UBenQ MA320U≈ $6407.4
Display
Screen size31.5″31.5″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density140 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate76 Hz61 Hz
Brightness (typical)550 nits350 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)600 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)1,300:11,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage99%—
DCI-P3 coverage97%95%
Colour depth10 bit—
HDRDisplayHDR 600HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W60 W
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs—1
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment115 mm130 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight9.1 kg10.3 kg
Width714 mm714 mm
Height609 mm641 mm
Depth220 mm407 mm
Product lineBenQ MA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare