- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- MA320U vs VP3456A
BenQ MA320U vs ViewSonic VP3456A
What MA320U does better (5) and where VP3456A wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
MA320UVP3456A
| MA320U | VP3456A | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 609 mm | 480.5 mm | +128.5 mm |
| Width | 714 mm | 809 mm | −95 mm |
| Depth | 220 mm | 243 mm | −23 mm |
| Weight | 9.1 kg | 11.2 kg | −2.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MA320U better than VP3456A?
- Pixel density140 ppi vs 110 ppi+27%
- Brightness (typical)550 nits vs 400 nits+38%
- Colour depth10 bit vs 8 bit+25%
- Panel typeIPS vs VA
- Weight9.1 kg vs 11.2 kg+23%
Why is VP3456A better than MA320U?
- Contrast ratio (static)1,300:1 vs 4,000:13.1×
- Height adjustment115 mm vs 130 mm+13%
- Screen size31.5″ vs 34″+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 31.5″ | 34″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 3440 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | Ultrawide QHD |
| Pixel density | 140 ppi | 110 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 21:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | VA |
| Refresh rate | 76 Hz | 75 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 550 nits | 400 nits |
| Peak brightness (HDR) | 600 nits | — |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,300:1 | 4,000:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 99% | 99% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 97% | — |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | 8 bit |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 600 | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 90 W | — |
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | — | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | — |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 115 mm | 130 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | — |
| Swivel | Yes | Yes |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | — |
| Weight | 9.1 kg | 11.2 kg |
| Width | 714 mm | 809 mm |
| Height | 609 mm | 480 mm |
| Depth | 220 mm | 243 mm |
| Product line | BenQ MA | — |
