How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. MA320UP vs VP3276T-4K

BenQ MA320UP vs ViewSonic VP3276T-4K

What MA320UP does better (2) and where VP3276T-4K wins (4) — every spec side by side.

BenQ MA320UP
BenQ · 2025MA320UP
6.6Score
2 advantages≈ $770
vs
ViewSonic VP3276T-4K
ViewSonic · 2026VP3276T-4K
7.0Score
4 advantages≈ $800
Higher score
6.9Screen7.0
6.1Colour accuracy7.6
6.8Connectivity2.9
4.0Design & ergonomics5.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

MA320UPVP3276T-4K
714 × 609220714.2 × 456.9209.7
MA320UPVP3276T-4KDifference
Height609 mm456.9 mm+152.1 mm
Width714 mm714.2 mm−0.2 mm
Depth220 mm209.7 mm+10.3 mm
Weight9.1 kg7.8 kg+1.3 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MA320UP better than VP3276T-4K?

  1. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W vs 15 W6×
  2. Brightness (typical)550 nits vs 400 nits+38%

Why is VP3276T-4K better than MA320UP?

  1. Anti-glare / matte screenNo · MA320UP: Yes
  2. Contrast ratio (static)1,300:1 vs 2,000:1+54%
  3. Weight9.1 kg vs 7.8 kg+17%
  4. Height adjustment115 mm vs 120 mm+4%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ MA320UPBenQ MA320UP≈ $7706.6
Display
Screen size31.5″32″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density140 ppi138 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)550 nits400 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)600 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)1,300:12,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenNoYes
Colour
sRGB coverage99%100%
DCI-P3 coverage97%98%
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
HDRDisplayHDR 600—
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W15 W
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs—1
USB hubYes—
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment115 mm120 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight9.1 kg7.8 kg
Width714 mm714 mm
Height609 mm457 mm
Depth220 mm210 mm
Product lineBenQ MA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare