How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. SW272QN vs VP3276T-4K

BenQ SW272QN vs ViewSonic VP3276T-4K

What SW272QN does better (2) and where VP3276T-4K wins (5) — every spec side by side.

BenQ SW272QN
BenQ · 2026SW272QN
8.2Score
2 advantages≈ $870
Higher score
vs
ViewSonic VP3276T-4K
ViewSonic · 2026VP3276T-4K
7.0Score
5 advantages≈ $800
2.8Screen7.0
9.7Colour accuracy7.6
5.7Connectivity2.9
6.6Design & ergonomics5.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

SW272QNVP3276T-4K
614 × 592274714.2 × 456.9209.7
SW272QNVP3276T-4KDifference
Height592 mm456.9 mm+135.1 mm
Width614 mm714.2 mm−100.2 mm
Depth274 mm209.7 mm+64.3 mm
Weight8.3 kg7.8 kg+0.5 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is SW272QN better than VP3276T-4K?

  1. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W vs 15 W6×
  2. Height adjustment140 mm vs 120 mm+17%

Why is VP3276T-4K better than SW272QN?

  1. Pixel density109 ppi vs 138 ppi+27%
  2. Brightness (typical)300 nits vs 400 nits+33%
  3. Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1 vs 2,000:12×
  4. Screen size27″ vs 32″+19%
  5. Weight8.3 kg vs 7.8 kg+6%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ SW272QNBenQ SW272QN≈ $8708.2
Display
Screen size27″32″
Resolution2560 × 14403840 × 2160
Resolution classQHD / 2.5K4K UHD
Pixel density109 ppi138 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)300 nits400 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:12,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage—100%
Adobe RGB coverage100%—
DCI-P3 coverage99%98%
Colour depth—10 bit
HDRHDR10—
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W15 W
ThunderboltYes—
KVM switchYes—
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYes—
Built-in speakers—Yes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment140 mm120 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight8.3 kg7.8 kg
Width614 mm714 mm
Height592 mm457 mm
Depth274 mm210 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare