How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. SW272QN vs VP2786A-4K

BenQ SW272QN vs ViewSonic VP2786A-4K

What SW272QN does better (1) and where VP2786A-4K wins (3) — every spec side by side.

BenQ SW272QN
BenQ · 2026SW272QN
8.2Score
1 advantage≈ $870
vs
ViewSonic VP2786A-4K
ViewSonic · 2025VP2786A-4K
8.3Score
3 advantages
Higher score
2.8Screen7.4
9.7Colour accuracy6.9
5.7Connectivity6.5
6.6Design & ergonomics5.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

SW272QNVP2786A-4K
614 × 592274613 × 449.1232
SW272QNVP2786A-4KDifference
Height592 mm449.1 mm+142.9 mm
Width614 mm613 mm+1 mm
Depth274 mm232 mm+42 mm
Weight8.3 kg8.3 kg=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is SW272QN better than VP2786A-4K?

  1. Height adjustment140 mm vs 130 mm+8%

Why is VP2786A-4K better than SW272QN?

  1. Pixel density109 ppi vs 163 ppi+50%
  2. Brightness (typical)300 nits vs 350 nits+17%
  3. Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1 vs 1,300:1+30%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ SW272QNBenQ SW272QN≈ $8708.2
Display
Screen size27″27″
Resolution2560 × 14403840 × 2160
Resolution classQHD / 2.5K4K UHD
Pixel density109 ppi163 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz—
Brightness (typical)300 nits350 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,300:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
Adobe RGB coverage100%100%
DCI-P3 coverage99%98%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)—ΔE 2
Colour depth—10 bit
Hardware calibration—Yes
Factory calibrated (report)—Yes
HDRHDR10—
Uniformity compensation—Yes
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W90 W
ThunderboltYes—
KVM switchYes—
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYes—
Built-in speakers—Yes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment140 mm130 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight8.3 kg8.3 kg
Width614 mm613 mm
Height592 mm449 mm
Depth274 mm232 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare