- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- PD2705U vs PD2725U
BenQ PD2705U vs BenQ PD2725U
What PD2705U does better (0) and where PD2725U wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD2705UPD2725U
| PD2705U | PD2725U | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 450 mm | 600 mm | −150 mm |
| Width | 615 mm | 615 mm | = |
| Depth | 188 mm | 273 mm | −85 mm |
| Weight | 8.3 kg | 8.3 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD2705U better than PD2725U?
PD2705U has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is PD2725U better than PD2705U?
- HDRHDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
- Pivot (portrait rotation)No · PD2705U: Yes
- Height adjustment110 mm vs 150 mm+36%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 27″ | 27″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 163 ppi | 163 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 250 nits | 250 nits |
| Peak brightness (HDR) | 350 nits | — |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,200:1 | 1,200:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 99% | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | — |
| HDR | HDR10 | DisplayHDR 400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | 65 W |
| Thunderbolt | — | Yes |
| KVM switch | — | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 110 mm | 150 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | No | Yes |
| Swivel | Yes | Yes |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 8.3 kg | 8.3 kg |
| Width | 615 mm | 615 mm |
| Height | 450 mm | 600 mm |
| Depth | 188 mm | 273 mm |
| Product line | BenQ PD | — |
