- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- PD2705UA vs PD3205UA
BenQ PD2705UA vs BenQ PD3205UA
What PD2705UA does better (2) and where PD3205UA wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD2705UAPD3205UA
| PD2705UA | PD3205UA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 703 mm | 731 mm | −28 mm |
| Width | 614 mm | 715 mm | −101 mm |
| Depth | 459 mm | 459 mm | = |
| Weight | 10 kg | 10.1 kg | −0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD2705UA better than PD3205UA?
- Pixel density163 ppi vs 140 ppi+16%
- Contrast ratio (static)1,200:1 vs 1,000:1+20%
Why is PD3205UA better than PD2705UA?
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery)65 W vs 90 W+38%
- Screen size27″ vs 31.5″+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 27″ | 31.5″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 163 ppi | 140 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 250 nits | 250 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,200:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 99% | 99% |
| HDR | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 65 W | 90 W |
| KVM switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | Yes |
| Weight | 10 kg | 10.1 kg |
| Width | 614 mm | 715 mm |
| Height | 703 mm | 731 mm |
| Depth | 459 mm | 459 mm |
