How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. PD2706QN vs UltraFine 32UN880K

BenQ PD2706QN vs LG UltraFine 32UN880K

What PD2706QN does better (3) and where UltraFine 32UN880K wins (4) — every spec side by side.

BenQ PD2706QN
BenQ · 2025PD2706QN
4.2Score
3 advantages≈ $430
vs
LG UltraFine 32UN880K
5.4Score
4 advantages≈ $410
Higher score
3.9Screen6.4
4.6Connectivity3.4
4.0Design & ergonomics4.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

PD2706QNUltraFine 32UN880K
614 × 545220714 × 641407
PD2706QNUltraFine 32UN880KDifference
Height545 mm641 mm−96 mm
Width614 mm714 mm−100 mm
Depth220 mm407 mm−187 mm
Weight9.3 kg10.3 kg−1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is PD2706QN better than UltraFine 32UN880K?

  1. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W vs 60 W+50%
  2. Refresh rate100 Hz vs 61 Hz+64%
  3. Weight9.32 kg vs 10.3 kg+11%

Why is UltraFine 32UN880K better than PD2706QN?

  1. Pixel density109 ppi vs 140 ppi+28%
  2. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
  3. Screen size27″ vs 31.5″+17%
  4. Height adjustment115 mm vs 130 mm+13%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ PD2706QNBenQ PD2706QN≈ $4304.2
Display
Screen size27″31.5″
Resolution2560 × 14403840 × 2160
Resolution classQHD / 2.5K4K UHD
Pixel density109 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate100 Hz61 Hz
Brightness (typical)350 nits350 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%—
DCI-P3 coverage95%95%
Colour depth8 bit—
HDRHDR10HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W60 W
KVM switchYes—
HDMI inputs12
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Daisy chain (DP MST)Yes—
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment115 mm130 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight9.32 kg10.3 kg
Width614 mm714 mm
Height545 mm641 mm
Depth220 mm407 mm
Product lineBenQ PD—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare