How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. PD2706UA vs UltraFine 32UN880

BenQ PD2706UA vs LG UltraFine 32UN880

What PD2706UA does better (5) and where UltraFine 32UN880 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

BenQ PD2706UA
BenQ · 2023PD2706UA
6.4Score
5 advantages≈ $640
Higher score
vs
LG UltraFine 32UN880
5.1Score
2 advantages≈ $610
6.9Screen6.5
4.4Connectivity3.3
6.7Design & ergonomics3.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

PD2706UAUltraFine 32UN880
614 × 703463714 × 771407
PD2706UAUltraFine 32UN880Difference
Height703 mm771 mm−68 mm
Width614 mm714 mm−100 mm
Depth463 mm407 mm+56 mm
Weight9.1 kg10.3 kg−1.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is PD2706UA better than UltraFine 32UN880?

  1. Pixel density163 ppi vs 140 ppi+16%
  2. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W vs 60 W+50%
  3. HDRDisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
  4. Contrast ratio (static)1,200:1 vs 1,000:1+20%
  5. Weight9.1 kg vs 10.3 kg+13%

Why is UltraFine 32UN880 better than PD2706UA?

  1. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
  2. Screen size27″ vs 31.5″+17%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ PD2706UABenQ PD2706UA≈ $6406.4
Display
Screen size27″31.5″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density163 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz61 Hz
Brightness (typical)350 nits350 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)400 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)1,200:11,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage99%—
DCI-P3 coverage95%95%
Colour depth10 bit—
HDRDisplayHDR 400HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W60 W
KVM switchYes—
HDMI inputs12
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment150 mm—
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYes—
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight9.1 kg10.3 kg
Width614 mm714 mm
Height703 mm771 mm
Depth463 mm407 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare