How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. PD2725U vs UltraSharp U4323QE

BenQ PD2725U vs Dell UltraSharp U4323QE

What PD2725U does better (3) and where UltraSharp U4323QE wins (5) — every spec side by side.

BenQ PD2725U
BenQ · 2023PD2725U
6.8Score
3 advantages≈ $860
vs
Dell UltraSharp U4323QE
Dell · 2023UltraSharp U4323QE
6.8Score
5 advantages≈ $1,000
Higher score
5.1Screen4.4
4.0Connectivity8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

PD2725UUltraSharp U4323QE
615 × 600273967 × 655256
PD2725UUltraSharp U4323QEDifference
Height600 mm655 mm−55 mm
Width615 mm967 mm−352 mm
Depth273 mm256 mm+17 mm
Weight8.3 kg18.6 kg−10.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is PD2725U better than UltraSharp U4323QE?

  1. Pixel density163 ppi vs 104 ppi+57%
  2. Weight8.3 kg vs 18.55 kg2.2×
  3. Contrast ratio (static)1,200:1 vs 1,000:1+20%

Why is UltraSharp U4323QE better than PD2725U?

  1. Brightness (typical)250 nits vs 350 nits+40%
  2. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)65 W vs 90 W+38%
  3. DisplayPort inputs1 vs 22×
  4. Screen size27″ vs 42.5″+57%
  5. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 76 Hz+27%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ PD2725UBenQ PD2725U≈ $8606.8
Display
Screen size27″42.5″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density163 ppi104 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz76 Hz
Brightness (typical)250 nits350 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,200:11,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage—95%
DCI-P3 coverage100%—
HDRDisplayHDR 400—
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)65 W90 W
ThunderboltYes—
KVM switchYesYes
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs12
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment150 mm—
Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes—
SwivelYes—
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight8.3 kg18.55 kg
Width615 mm967 mm
Height600 mm655 mm
Depth273 mm256 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare