- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- PD3205U vs PD3225U
BenQ PD3205U vs BenQ PD3225U
What PD3205U does better (1) and where PD3225U wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD3205UPD3225U
| PD3205U | PD3225U | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 589 mm | 628 mm | −39 mm |
| Width | 715 mm | 715 mm | = |
| Depth | 257 mm | 273 mm | −16 mm |
| Weight | 9.4 kg | 8.2 kg | +1.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD3205U better than PD3225U?
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W vs 85 W+6%
Why is PD3225U better than PD3205U?
- Brightness (typical)250 nits vs 400 nits+60%
- Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1 vs 2,000:12×
- HDRHDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Weight9.4 kg vs 8.2 kg+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 31.5″ | 31.5″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 140 ppi | 140 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 250 nits | 400 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | 2,000:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 99% | 98% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 98% |
| HDR | HDR10 | DisplayHDR 400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 90 W | 85 W |
| Thunderbolt | — | Yes |
| KVM switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | — | 150 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | Yes |
| Swivel | — | Yes |
| VESA mount | — | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 9.4 kg | 8.2 kg |
| Width | 715 mm | 715 mm |
| Height | 589 mm | 628 mm |
| Depth | 257 mm | 273 mm |
