- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- PD3205UA vs SW272Q
BenQ PD3205UA vs BenQ SW272Q
What PD3205UA does better (2) and where SW272Q wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD3205UASW272Q
| PD3205UA | SW272Q | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 731 mm | 592 mm | +139 mm |
| Width | 715 mm | 614 mm | +101 mm |
| Depth | 459 mm | 274 mm | +185 mm |
| Weight | 10.1 kg | 8.3 kg | +1.8 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD3205UA better than SW272Q?
- Pixel density140 ppi vs 109 ppi+28%
- Screen size31.5″ vs 27″+17%
Why is SW272Q better than PD3205UA?
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Brightness (typical)250 nits vs 300 nits+20%
- Weight10.1 kg vs 8.3 kg+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 31.5″ | 27″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | QHD / 2.5K |
| Pixel density | 140 ppi | 109 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 250 nits | 300 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 99% | 100% |
| Adobe RGB coverage | — | 99% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 98% |
| HDR | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 90 W | 90 W |
| KVM switch | Yes | — |
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | — |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | — | 140 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | Yes |
| Swivel | — | Yes |
| VESA mount | — | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 10.1 kg | 8.3 kg |
| Width | 715 mm | 614 mm |
| Height | 731 mm | 592 mm |
| Depth | 459 mm | 274 mm |
