- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- PD3205UA vs UltraFine 32UQ850
BenQ PD3205UA vs LG UltraFine 32UQ850
What PD3205UA does better (0) and where UltraFine 32UQ850 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.7Screen7.5
4.3Connectivity5.8
3.9Design & ergonomics4.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD3205UAUltraFine 32UQ850
| PD3205UA | UltraFine 32UQ850 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 731 mm | 598 mm | +133 mm |
| Width | 715 mm | 715 mm | = |
| Depth | 459 mm | 239 mm | +220 mm |
| Weight | 10.1 kg | 7.2 kg | +2.9 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD3205UA better than UltraFine 32UQ850?
PD3205UA has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is UltraFine 32UQ850 better than PD3205UA?
- Brightness (typical)250 nits vs 400 nits+60%
- Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1 vs 2,000:12×
- HDRHDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Weight10.1 kg vs 7.2 kg+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 31.5″ | 31.5″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 140 ppi | 140 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 250 nits | 400 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | 2,000:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 99% | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 98% |
| HDR | HDR10 | DisplayHDR 400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 90 W | 90 W |
| KVM switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | — | 110 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | Yes |
| VESA mount | — | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 10.1 kg | 7.2 kg |
| Width | 715 mm | 715 mm |
| Height | 731 mm | 598 mm |
| Depth | 459 mm | 239 mm |
| Product line | — | LG UltraFine |
