How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. PD3225U vs UltraSharp U4323QE

BenQ PD3225U vs Dell UltraSharp U4323QE

What PD3225U does better (5) and where UltraSharp U4323QE wins (4) — every spec side by side.

BenQ PD3225U
BenQ · 2024PD3225U
8.3Score
5 advantages≈ $1,100
Higher score
vs
Dell UltraSharp U4323QE
Dell · 2023UltraSharp U4323QE
6.8Score
4 advantages≈ $1,000
7.5Screen4.4
5.2Connectivity8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

PD3225UUltraSharp U4323QE
715 × 628273967 × 655256
PD3225UUltraSharp U4323QEDifference
Height628 mm655 mm−27 mm
Width715 mm967 mm−252 mm
Depth273 mm256 mm+17 mm
Weight8.2 kg18.6 kg−10.4 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is PD3225U better than UltraSharp U4323QE?

  1. Pixel density140 ppi vs 104 ppi+35%
  2. Weight8.2 kg vs 18.55 kg2.3×
  3. Contrast ratio (static)2,000:1 vs 1,000:12×
  4. Brightness (typical)400 nits vs 350 nits+14%
  5. sRGB coverage98% vs 95%+3%

Why is UltraSharp U4323QE better than PD3225U?

  1. DisplayPort inputs1 vs 22×
  2. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)85 W vs 90 W+6%
  3. Screen size31.5″ vs 42.5″+35%
  4. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 76 Hz+27%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ PD3225UBenQ PD3225U≈ $1,1008.3
Display
Screen size31.5″42.5″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density140 ppi104 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz76 Hz
Brightness (typical)400 nits350 nits
Contrast ratio (static)2,000:11,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage98%95%
DCI-P3 coverage98%—
HDRDisplayHDR 400—
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)85 W90 W
ThunderboltYes—
KVM switchYesYes
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs12
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment150 mm—
Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes—
SwivelYes—
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight8.2 kg18.55 kg
Width715 mm967 mm
Height628 mm655 mm
Depth273 mm256 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare