- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- PD3225U vs Deco Pro (Gen 2)
BenQ PD3225U vs XP-Pen Deco Pro (Gen 2)
What PD3225U does better (0) and where Deco Pro (Gen 2) wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Connectivity8.6
Why is PD3225U better than Deco Pro (Gen 2)?
PD3225U has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Deco Pro (Gen 2) better than PD3225U?
Deco Pro (Gen 2) has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 31.5″ | — |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | — |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | — |
| Pixel density | 140 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | — |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Brightness (typical) | 400 nits | — |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 2,000:1 | — |
| Response time | 5 ms | — |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | — |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 98% | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 98% | — |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 | — |
| Pen & controls | ||
| Pressure levels | — | 16,384 |
| Tilt recognition | — | ±60° |
| Pen resolution | — | 5,080 lpi |
| Report rate | — | 200 RPS |
| Pen accuracy (centre) | — | ±0.4 mm |
| Pen with eraser | — | Yes |
| Multi-touch | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 85 W | — |
| Thunderbolt | Yes | — |
| KVM switch | Yes | — |
| HDMI inputs | 2 | — |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | — |
| USB hub | Yes | — |
| Wireless connection | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | — |
| Compatibility | — | Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, ChromeOS, iOS / iPadOS |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 150 mm | — |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | — |
| Swivel | Yes | — |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | — |
| Weight | 8.2 kg | — |
| Width | 715 mm | — |
| Height | 628 mm | — |
| Depth | 273 mm | — |
| Product line | — | XP-Pen Deco |
