- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- PD3420Q vs VP2786-4K
BenQ PD3420Q vs ViewSonic VP2786-4K
What PD3420Q does better (2) and where VP2786-4K wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD3420QVP2786-4K
| PD3420Q | VP2786-4K | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 445 mm | 449.1 mm | −4.1 mm |
| Width | 826 mm | 613 mm | +213 mm |
| Depth | 244 mm | 232 mm | +12 mm |
| Weight | 9.3 kg | 8.3 kg | +1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD3420Q better than VP2786-4K?
- Screen size34″ vs 27″+26%
- Height adjustment150 mm vs 130 mm+15%
Why is VP2786-4K better than PD3420Q?
- Pixel density109 ppi vs 163 ppi+50%
- Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1 vs 1,300:1+30%
- Weight9.3 kg vs 8.3 kg+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 34″ | 27″ |
| Resolution | 3440 × 1440 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | Ultrawide QHD | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 109 ppi | 163 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 21:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Brightness (typical) | 350 nits | 350 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | 1,300:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Adobe RGB coverage | — | 100% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 98% | 98% |
| Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed) | — | ΔE 2 |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | 10 bit |
| Hardware calibration | — | Yes |
| Factory calibrated (report) | — | Yes |
| HDR | HDR10 | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | 90 W |
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | — |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 150 mm | 130 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | No | — |
| Swivel | Yes | Yes |
| Weight | 9.3 kg | 8.3 kg |
| Width | 826 mm | 613 mm |
| Height | 445 mm | 449 mm |
| Depth | 244 mm | 232 mm |
| Product line | BenQ DesignVue | — |
