How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. SW242Q vs UltraFine 32UN880K

BenQ SW242Q vs LG UltraFine 32UN880K

What SW242Q does better (4) and where UltraFine 32UN880K wins (3) — every spec side by side.

BenQ SW242Q
BenQ · 2024SW242Q
6.4Score
4 advantages≈ $430
Higher score
vs
LG UltraFine 32UN880K
5.4Score
3 advantages≈ $410
4.4Screen6.4
4.3Connectivity3.4
7.7Design & ergonomics4.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

SW242QUltraFine 32UN880K
533 × 573263714 × 641407
SW242QUltraFine 32UN880KDifference
Height573 mm641 mm−68 mm
Width533 mm714 mm−181 mm
Depth263 mm407 mm−144 mm
Weight7.8 kg10.3 kg−2.5 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is SW242Q better than UltraFine 32UN880K?

  1. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W vs 60 W+50%
  2. Brightness (typical)400 nits vs 350 nits+14%
  3. DCI-P3 coverage98% vs 95%+3%
  4. Weight7.8 kg vs 10.3 kg+32%

Why is UltraFine 32UN880K better than SW242Q?

  1. Pixel density125 ppi vs 140 ppi+12%
  2. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
  3. Screen size24.1″ vs 31.5″+31%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ SW242QBenQ SW242Q≈ $4306.4
Display
Screen size24.1″31.5″
Resolution2560 × 16003840 × 2160
Resolution classQHD / 2.5K4K UHD
Pixel density125 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:1016:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz61 Hz
Brightness (typical)400 nits350 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%—
Adobe RGB coverage99%—
DCI-P3 coverage98%95%
HDRHDR10HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W60 W
KVM switchYes—
HDMI inputs12
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakers—Yes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—130 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
Swivel—Yes
VESA mount—100 × 100 mm
Weight7.8 kg10.3 kg
Width533 mm714 mm
Height573 mm641 mm
Depth263 mm407 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare