How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. SW272Q vs ColorEdge CS2731

BenQ SW272Q vs EIZO ColorEdge CS2731

What SW272Q does better (4) and where ColorEdge CS2731 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

BenQ SW272Q
BenQ · 2023SW272Q
5.9Score
4 advantages≈ $670
Higher score
vs
EIZO ColorEdge CS2731
EIZO · 2019ColorEdge CS2731
5.7Score
2 advantages≈ $860
2.8Screen3.1
5.5Colour accuracy7.9
6.2Connectivity2.3
6.6Design & ergonomics7.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

SW272QColorEdge CS2731
614 × 592274638 × 404.1265
SW272QColorEdge CS2731Difference
Height592 mm404.1 mm+187.9 mm
Width614 mm638 mm−24 mm
Depth274 mm265 mm+9 mm
Weight8.3 kg10.1 kg−1.8 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is SW272Q better than ColorEdge CS2731?

  1. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W vs 60 W+50%
  2. Response time5 ms vs 10 ms2×
  3. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  4. Weight8.3 kg vs 10.1 kg+22%

Why is ColorEdge CS2731 better than SW272Q?

  1. Brightness (typical)300 nits vs 350 nits+17%
  2. Height adjustment140 mm vs 155 mm+11%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ SW272QBenQ SW272Q≈ $6705.9
Display
Screen size27″27″
Resolution2560 × 14402560 × 1440
Resolution classQHD / 2.5KQHD / 2.5K
Pixel density109 ppi109 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz61 Hz
Brightness (typical)300 nits350 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,000:1
Response time5 ms10 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%100%
Adobe RGB coverage99%99%
DCI-P3 coverage98%99%
Colour depth—10 bit
HDRHDR10—
Uniformity compensation—Yes
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W60 W
HDMI inputs21
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakers—No
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment140 mm155 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight8.3 kg10.1 kg
Width614 mm638 mm
Height592 mm404 mm
Depth274 mm265 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare