How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. SW272U vs ColorEdge CS2740

BenQ SW272U vs EIZO ColorEdge CS2740

What SW272U does better (5) and where ColorEdge CS2740 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

BenQ SW272U
BenQ · 2024SW272U
8.3Score
5 advantages≈ $1,350
Higher score
vs
EIZO ColorEdge CS2740
EIZO · 2019ColorEdge CS2740
6.6Score
1 advantage≈ $1,150
7.1Screen5.9
7.1Colour accuracy7.9
6.2Connectivity2.3
6.3Design & ergonomics6.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

SW272UColorEdge CS2740
614 × 592274638 × 404.1265
SW272UColorEdge CS2740Difference
Height592 mm404.1 mm+187.9 mm
Width614 mm638 mm−24 mm
Depth274 mm265 mm+9 mm
Weight8.6 kg10.3 kg−1.7 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is SW272U better than ColorEdge CS2740?

  1. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W vs 60 W+50%
  2. Response time5 ms vs 10 ms2×
  3. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  4. Brightness (typical)400 nits vs 350 nits+14%
  5. Weight8.6 kg vs 10.3 kg+20%

Why is ColorEdge CS2740 better than SW272U?

  1. Height adjustment140 mm vs 155 mm+11%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ SW272UBenQ SW272U≈ $1,3508.3
Display
Screen size27″26.9″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density163 ppi164 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)400 nits350 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,000:1
Response time5 ms10 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%100%
Adobe RGB coverage99%99%
DCI-P3 coverage99%99%
Colour depth—10 bit
HDRHDR10—
Uniformity compensation—Yes
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W60 W
HDMI inputs21
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakers—No
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment140 mm155 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight8.6 kg10.3 kg
Width614 mm638 mm
Height592 mm404 mm
Depth274 mm265 mm
Product line—EIZO ColorEdge
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare