- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- SW272U vs UltraFine 32UQ85X
BenQ SW272U vs LG UltraFine 32UQ85X
What SW272U does better (3) and where UltraFine 32UQ85X wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Screen7.6
7.0Colour accuracy8.2
6.3Connectivity6.3
6.3Design & ergonomics2.0
Why is SW272U better than UltraFine 32UQ85X?
- Pixel density163 ppi vs 140 ppi+16%
- Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes · UltraFine 32UQ85X: No
- SwivelYes · UltraFine 32UQ85X: No
Why is UltraFine 32UQ85X better than SW272U?
- Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1 vs 2,000:12×
- HDRHDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
- Screen size27″ vs 31.5″+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 27″ | 31.5″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 163 ppi | 140 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 400 nits | 400 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | 2,000:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Adobe RGB coverage | 99% | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 99% | 98% |
| Colour depth | — | 10 bit |
| HDR | HDR10 | DisplayHDR 400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 90 W | 90 W |
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 140 mm | — |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | No |
| Swivel | Yes | No |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | — |
| Weight | 8.6 kg | — |
| Width | 614 mm | — |
| Height | 592 mm | — |
| Depth | 274 mm | — |
| Product line | — | LG UltraFine |
