How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. UltraSharp U3423WE vs ThinkVision P27h-20

Dell UltraSharp U3423WE vs Lenovo ThinkVision P27h-20

What UltraSharp U3423WE does better (8) and where ThinkVision P27h-20 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Dell UltraSharp U3423WE
Dell · 2022UltraSharp U3423WE
7.2Score
8 advantages≈ $750
Higher score
vs
Lenovo ThinkVision P27h-20
Lenovo · 2020ThinkVision P27h-20
3.6Score
1 advantage≈ $640
4.2Screen3.2
7.7Colour accuracy2.3
5.7Connectivity3.6
5.6Design & ergonomics3.8

Why is UltraSharp U3423WE better than ThinkVision P27h-20?

  1. Colour depth10 bit vs 8 bit+25%
  2. Contrast ratio (static)2,000:1 vs 1,000:12×
  3. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  4. Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes · ThinkVision P27h-20: No
  5. DCI-P3 coverage98% vs 85%+15%
  6. Screen size34″ vs 27″+26%
  7. Response time5 ms vs 6 ms+20%
  8. Height adjustment150 mm vs 135 mm+11%

Why is ThinkVision P27h-20 better than UltraSharp U3423WE?

  1. Brightness (typical)300 nits vs 350 nits+17%
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size34″27″
Resolution3440 × 14402560 × 1440
Resolution classUltrawide QHDQHD / 2.5K
Pixel density109 ppi109 ppi
Aspect ratio21:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)300 nits350 nits
Contrast ratio (static)2,000:11,000:1
Response time5 ms6 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Curved screenYes—
Colour
sRGB coverage100%99%
DCI-P3 coverage98%85%
Colour depth10 bit8 bit
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)Yes—
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W—
KVM switchYes—
HDMI inputs21
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Ethernet (RJ45)YesYes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment150 mm135 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesNo
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight11.44 kg—
Width813 mm—
Height393 mm—
Depth237 mm—
Product lineDell UltraSharpLenovo ThinkVision
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare