- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- UltraSharp U4320Q vs ColorEdge CS2410
Dell UltraSharp U4320Q vs EIZO ColorEdge CS2410
What UltraSharp U4320Q does better (7) and where ColorEdge CS2410 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.2Screen2.2
3.4Design & ergonomics6.0
Why is UltraSharp U4320Q better than ColorEdge CS2410?
- Pixel density103 ppi vs 94 ppi+10%
- Colour depth10 bit vs 8 bit+25%
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes · ColorEdge CS2410: No
- Brightness (typical)350 nits vs 300 nits+17%
- Screen size42.5″ vs 24.1″+76%
- Response time8 ms vs 14 ms+75%
Why is ColorEdge CS2410 better than UltraSharp U4320Q?
- Height adjustment60 mm vs 155 mm2.6×
- sRGB coverage96% vs 100%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 42.5″ | 24.1″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 103 ppi | 94 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 350 nits | 300 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | 8 ms | 14 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 96% | 100% |
| Adobe RGB coverage | — | 80% |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | 8 bit |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 60 mm | 155 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | No |
| Swivel | Yes | Yes |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | — | 7.9 kg |
| Width | — | 554 mm |
| Height | — | 396 mm |
| Depth | — | 551 mm |
| Product line | Dell UltraSharp | EIZO ColorEdge |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ProArt PA248QVvsDell UltraSharp U4320Q
4.23.7
vs
Dell UltraSharp U4320QvsDell UltraSharp U2721DE
3.73.9
vs
Dell UltraSharp U4320QvsDell UltraSharp U2421HE
3.73.5
vs
LG UltraFine 32UN880vsDell UltraSharp U4320Q
4.93.7
vs
Huawei MateView GTvsDell UltraSharp U4320Q
vs
Lenovo ThinkVision P24h-2LvsDell UltraSharp U4320Q
3.83.7


