- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- UltraSharp U4320Q vs ColorEdge CS2410
Dell UltraSharp U4320Q vs EIZO ColorEdge CS2410
What UltraSharp U4320Q does better (7) and where ColorEdge CS2410 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.4Screen2.2
3.5Design & ergonomics6.1
Why is UltraSharp U4320Q better than ColorEdge CS2410?
- Pixel density103 ppi vs 94 ppi+10%
- Colour depth10 bit vs 8 bit+25%
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes · ColorEdge CS2410: No
- Brightness (typical)350 nits vs 300 nits+17%
- Screen size42.5″ vs 24.1″+76%
- Response time8 ms vs 14 ms+75%
Why is ColorEdge CS2410 better than UltraSharp U4320Q?
- Height adjustment60 mm vs 155 mm2.6×
- sRGB coverage96% vs 100%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 42.5″ | 24.1″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 103 ppi | 94 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 350 nits | 300 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | 8 ms | 14 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 96% | 100% |
| Adobe RGB coverage | — | 80% |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | 8 bit |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 60 mm | 155 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | No |
| Swivel | Yes | Yes |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | — | 7.9 kg |
| Width | — | 554 mm |
| Height | — | 396 mm |
| Depth | — | 551 mm |
| Product line | Dell UltraSharp | EIZO ColorEdge |
Related comparisons
vs
Dell UltraSharp U4320QvsLenovo ThinkVision P27h-20
3.83.6
vs
Asus ProArt PA248QVvsDell UltraSharp U4320Q
4.23.8
vs
Dell UltraSharp U4320QvsLenovo ThinkVision P24h-20
3.83.6
vs
Dell UltraSharp U4320QvsDell UltraSharp U2721DE
3.83.9
vs
Dell UltraSharp U4320QvsApple Pro Display XDR
vs
Dell UltraSharp U4320QvsBenQ SW270C
3.84.3