- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- SW270C vs UltraSharp U4320Q
BenQ SW270C vs Dell UltraSharp U4320Q
What SW270C does better (4) and where UltraSharp U4320Q wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.9Screen3.4
4.0Design & ergonomics3.5
Why is SW270C better than UltraSharp U4320Q?
- Height adjustment150 mm vs 60 mm2.5×
- Pixel density109 ppi vs 103 ppi+6%
- Response time5 ms vs 8 ms+60%
- sRGB coverage100% vs 96%+4%
Why is UltraSharp U4320Q better than SW270C?
- Pivot (portrait rotation)No · SW270C: Yes
- Brightness (typical)300 nits vs 350 nits+17%
- Screen size27″ vs 42.5″+57%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 27″ | 42.5″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | QHD / 2.5K | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 109 ppi | 103 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 300 nits | 350 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 8 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 96% |
| Adobe RGB coverage | 99% | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 97% | — |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | 10 bit |
| HDR | HDR10 | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 150 mm | 60 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | No | Yes |
| Swivel | Yes | Yes |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 9.8 kg | — |
| Width | 614 mm | — |
| Height | 626 mm | — |
| Depth | 335 mm | — |
| Product line | BenQ PhotoVue | Dell UltraSharp |
