- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- SW270C vs SW321C
BenQ SW270C vs BenQ SW321C
What SW270C does better (3) and where SW321C wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
SW270CSW321C
| SW270C | SW321C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 626 mm | 652 mm | −26 mm |
| Width | 614 mm | 747 mm | −133 mm |
| Depth | 335 mm | 224 mm | +111 mm |
| Weight | 9.8 kg | 11.8 kg | −2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is SW270C better than SW321C?
- Brightness (typical)300 nits vs 250 nits+20%
- DCI-P3 coverage97% vs 95%+2%
- Weight9.8 kg vs 11.8 kg+20%
Why is SW321C better than SW270C?
- Pixel density109 ppi vs 138 ppi+27%
- Pivot (portrait rotation)No · SW270C: Yes
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 76 Hz+27%
- Screen size27″ vs 32″+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 27″ | 32″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | QHD / 2.5K | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 109 ppi | 138 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 76 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 300 nits | 250 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Adobe RGB coverage | 99% | 99% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 97% | 95% |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | 10 bit |
| HDR | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | — | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 150 mm | 150 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | No | Yes |
| Swivel | Yes | Yes |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 9.8 kg | 11.8 kg |
| Width | 614 mm | 747 mm |
| Height | 626 mm | 652 mm |
| Depth | 335 mm | 224 mm |
| Product line | BenQ PhotoVue | — |
