- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- UltraSharp U4320Q vs MateView GT
Dell UltraSharp U4320Q vs Huawei MateView GT
What UltraSharp U4320Q does better (3) and where MateView GT wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.2Screen5.8
Why is UltraSharp U4320Q better than MateView GT?
- Panel typeIPS vs VA
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Screen size42.5″ vs 27″+57%
Why is MateView GT better than UltraSharp U4320Q?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 165 Hz2.8×
- Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1 vs 4,000:14×
- Pixel density103 ppi vs 109 ppi+6%
- Response time8 ms vs 4 ms2×
- sRGB coverage96% vs 100%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 42.5″ | 27″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | QHD / 2.5K |
| Pixel density | 103 ppi | 109 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | VA |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 350 nits | 350 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | 4,000:1 |
| Response time | 8 ms | 4 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | — |
| Curved screen | — | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 96% | 100% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 90% |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | — |
| HDR | — | HDR10 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | — |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 60 mm | — |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | — |
| Swivel | Yes | — |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | — |
| Weight | — | 7.8 kg |
| Width | — | 613 mm |
| Height | — | 546 mm |
| Depth | — | 224 mm |
| Product line | Dell UltraSharp | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ProArt PA248QVvsDell UltraSharp U4320Q
4.23.7
vs
Dell UltraSharp U4320QvsDell UltraSharp U2721DE
3.73.9
vs
Dell UltraSharp U4320QvsDell UltraSharp U2421HE
3.73.5
vs
LG UltraFine 32UN880vsDell UltraSharp U4320Q
4.93.7
vs
EIZO ColorEdge CS2410vsDell UltraSharp U4320Q
3.63.7
vs
Lenovo ThinkVision P24h-2LvsDell UltraSharp U4320Q
3.83.7


