How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. UltraSharp U4323QE vs UltraFine 40WP95C

Dell UltraSharp U4323QE vs LG UltraFine 40WP95C

What UltraSharp U4323QE does better (4) and where UltraFine 40WP95C wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Dell UltraSharp U4323QE
Dell · 2023UltraSharp U4323QE
6.8Score
4 advantages≈ $1,000
Higher score
vs
LG UltraFine 40WP95C
5.1Score
3 advantages≈ $1,150
4.4Screen5.8
8.4Connectivity9.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

UltraSharp U4323QEUltraFine 40WP95C
967 × 655256947 × 615283
UltraSharp U4323QEUltraFine 40WP95CDifference
Height655 mm615 mm+40 mm
Width967 mm947 mm+20 mm
Depth256 mm283 mm−27 mm
Weight18.6 kg12.3 kg+6.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is UltraSharp U4323QE better than UltraFine 40WP95C?

  1. DisplayPort inputs2 vs 12×
  2. Brightness (typical)350 nits vs 300 nits+17%
  3. Screen size42.5″ vs 39.7″+7%
  4. Refresh rate76 Hz vs 72 Hz+6%

Why is UltraFine 40WP95C better than UltraSharp U4323QE?

  1. Pixel density104 ppi vs 140 ppi+35%
  2. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W vs 96 W+7%
  3. Weight18.55 kg vs 12.3 kg+51%
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size42.5″39.7″
Resolution3840 × 21605120 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD5K
Pixel density104 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:921:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate76 Hz72 Hz
Brightness (typical)350 nits300 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Curved screen—Yes
Colour
sRGB coverage95%—
DCI-P3 coverage—98%
HDR—HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W96 W
Thunderbolt—Yes
KVM switchYes—
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs21
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—110 mm
Swivel—Yes
Weight18.55 kg12.3 kg
Width967 mm947 mm
Height655 mm615 mm
Depth256 mm283 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare