- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- M106K vs Deco Mini7W
GAOMON M106K vs XP-Pen Deco Mini7W
What M106K does better (3) and where Deco Mini7W wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.7Pen & controls4.8
2.3Design & ergonomics6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
M106KDeco Mini7W
| M106K | Deco Mini7W | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 240 mm | 162.2 mm | +77.8 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 260.2 mm | +99.8 mm |
| Depth | 10.5 mm | 9.3 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Weight | 0.8 kg | 0.3 kg | +0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M106K better than Deco Mini7W?
- Express keys28 vs 83.5×
- Active area (surface)404 cm² vs 198 cm²2×
- Report rate233 RPS vs 220 RPS+6%
Why is Deco Mini7W better than M106K?
- Pressure levels2,048 vs 8,1924×
- Weight0.78 kg vs 0.33 kg2.4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Pen & controls | ||
| Pressure levels | 2,048 | 8,192 |
| Tilt recognition | — | ±60° |
| Active area | 254 × 159 mm | 177.8 × 111.1 mm |
| Active area width | 254 mm | 178 mm |
| Active area height | 159 mm | 111 mm |
| Active area (surface) | 404 cm² | 198 cm² |
| Pen resolution | 5,080 lpi | 5,080 lpi |
| Report rate | 233 RPS | 220 RPS |
| Pen | — | Battery-free stylus |
| Express keys | 28 | 8 |
| Multi-touch | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless connection | No | — |
| Compatibility | Windows, macOS | Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, ChromeOS |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Stand | — | ≥15 days |
| Weight | 0.78 kg | 0.33 kg |
| Width | 360 mm | 260 mm |
| Height | 240 mm | 162 mm |
| Depth | 10 mm | 9 mm |
