- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- PD1320 vs PD1561 V2
GAOMON PD1320 vs GAOMON PD1561 V2
What PD1320 does better (2) and where PD1561 V2 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Why is PD1320 better than PD1561 V2?
- Pixel density166 ppi vs 142 ppi+17%
- Weight0.88 kg vs 1.58 kg+80%
Why is PD1561 V2 better than PD1320?
- Pressure levels8,192 vs 16,3842×
- USB-C video input (one cable)No · PD1320: Yes
- Report rate220 RPS vs 300 RPS+36%
- Active area (surface)485 cm² vs 667 cm²+38%
- Screen size13.3″ vs 15.5″+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 13.3″ | 15.5″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 166 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | — |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness (typical) | 220 nits | 220 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | — | 1,000:1 |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Pen & controls | ||
| Pressure levels | 8,192 | 16,384 |
| Tilt recognition | ±60° | ±60° |
| Active area | 294 × 165 mm | 344 × 194 mm |
| Active area width | 294 mm | 344 mm |
| Active area height | 165 mm | 194 mm |
| Active area (surface) | 485 cm² | 667 cm² |
| Pen resolution | 5,080 lpi | 5,080 lpi |
| Report rate | 220 RPS | 300 RPS |
| Battery-free pen | Yes | Yes |
| Express keys | — | 15 |
| Multi-touch | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | No | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| Wireless connection | No | No |
| Compatibility | Windows, macOS, Android | Windows, macOS, Linux, Android |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Weight | 0.88 kg | 1.58 kg |
