- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- PD1320 vs UE16
GAOMON PD1320 vs UGEE UE16
What PD1320 does better (2) and where UE16 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is PD1320 better than UE16?
- Pixel density166 ppi vs 143 ppi+16%
- Weight0.88 kg vs 1.28 kg+45%
Why is UE16 better than PD1320?
- Pressure levels8,192 vs 16,3842×
- USB-C video input (one cable)No · PD1320: Yes
- Active area (surface)485 cm² vs 655 cm²+35%
- Screen size13.3″ vs 15.4″+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 13.3″ | 15.4″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 166 ppi | 143 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | — |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness (typical) | 220 nits | 220 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | — | 1,000:1 |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Pen & controls | ||
| Pressure levels | 8,192 | 16,384 |
| Tilt recognition | ±60° | ±60° |
| Active area | 294 × 165 mm | 341 × 192 mm |
| Active area width | 294 mm | 341 mm |
| Active area height | 165 mm | 192 mm |
| Active area (surface) | 485 cm² | 655 cm² |
| Pen resolution | 5,080 lpi | 5,080 lpi |
| Report rate | 220 RPS | — |
| Pen accuracy (centre) | — | ±0.3 mm |
| Battery-free pen | Yes | Yes |
| Pen with eraser | — | Yes |
| Express keys | — | 8 |
| Multi-touch | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | No | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 1 | — |
| Wireless connection | No | No |
| Compatibility | Windows, macOS, Android | Windows, macOS, Android, ChromeOS |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Weight | 0.88 kg | 1.28 kg |
| Width | — | 438 mm |
| Height | — | 259 mm |
| Depth | — | 13 mm |
