- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- PD1320 vs Kamvas 13 (Gen 3)
GAOMON PD1320 vs Huion Kamvas 13 (Gen 3)
What PD1320 does better (0) and where Kamvas 13 (Gen 3) wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Screen4.0
3.3Pen & controls6.6
2.6Connectivity7.9
8.5Design & ergonomics8.6
Why is PD1320 better than Kamvas 13 (Gen 3)?
PD1320 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Kamvas 13 (Gen 3) better than PD1320?
- Pressure levels8,192 vs 16,3842×
- USB-C video input (one cable)No · PD1320: Yes
- Report rate220 RPS vs 260 RPS+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 13.3″ | 13.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 166 ppi | 166 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | — |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness (typical) | 220 nits | 220 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | — | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | — | 25 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Fully laminated screen | — | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| Colour depth | — | 8 bit |
| Pen & controls | ||
| Pressure levels | 8,192 | 16,384 |
| Tilt recognition | ±60° | ±60° |
| Active area | 294 × 165 mm | 293.8 × 165.2 mm |
| Active area width | 294 mm | 294 mm |
| Active area height | 165 mm | 165 mm |
| Active area (surface) | 485 cm² | 485 cm² |
| Pen resolution | 5,080 lpi | 5,080 lpi |
| Report rate | 220 RPS | 260 RPS |
| Pen accuracy (centre) | — | ±0.3 mm |
| Battery-free pen | Yes | Yes |
| Pen | — | PW600L |
| Express keys | — | 5 |
| Multi-touch | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | No | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 1 | — |
| Wireless connection | No | No |
| Compatibility | Windows, macOS, Android | Windows, macOS, Linux, Android |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Stand | — | (Optional)ST300 |
| Weight | 0.88 kg | 0.86 kg |
| Width | — | 361 mm |
| Height | — | 203 mm |
| Depth | — | 12 mm |
| Product line | — | Huion Kamvas |
