- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- MateView GT vs UltraFine 32UN550
Huawei MateView GT vs LG UltraFine 32UN550
What MateView GT does better (3) and where UltraFine 32UN550 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Screen7.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
MateView GTUltraFine 32UN550
| MateView GT | UltraFine 32UN550 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 546 mm | 596 mm | −50 mm |
| Width | 613 mm | 714 mm | −101 mm |
| Depth | 224 mm | 227 mm | −3 mm |
| Weight | 7.8 kg | 8.4 kg | −0.6 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MateView GT better than UltraFine 32UN550?
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 61 Hz2.7×
- Contrast ratio (static)4,000:1 vs 3,000:1+33%
- Weight7.8 kg vs 8.4 kg+8%
Why is UltraFine 32UN550 better than MateView GT?
- Pixel density109 ppi vs 140 ppi+28%
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Screen size27″ vs 31.5″+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 27″ | 31.5″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | QHD / 2.5K | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 109 ppi | 140 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | VA | VA |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 61 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 350 nits | 350 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 4,000:1 | 3,000:1 |
| Response time | 4 ms | 4 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | — | Yes |
| Curved screen | Yes | — |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 90% | 90% |
| HDR | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| Built-in speakers | — | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | — | 110 mm |
| Weight | 7.8 kg | 8.4 kg |
| Width | 613 mm | 714 mm |
| Height | 546 mm | 596 mm |
| Depth | 224 mm | 227 mm |
