How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. Kamvas 22 vs U1600

Huion Kamvas 22 vs UGEE U1600

What Kamvas 22 does better (3) and where U1600 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Huion Kamvas 22
Huion · 2023Kamvas 22
4.7Score
3 advantages≈ $320
vs
UGEE U1600
UGEE · 2023U1600
5.8Score
2 advantages
Higher score
2.5Screen3.0
5.8Pen & controls3.6
8.1Connectivity4.6
4.7Design & ergonomics6.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Kamvas 22U1600
546 × 32319402 × 263
Kamvas 22U1600Difference
Height323 mm263 mm+60 mm
Width546 mm402 mm+144 mm
Weight3.9 kg1.3 kg+2.6 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Kamvas 22 better than U1600?

  1. Active area (surface)1,278 cm² vs 655 cm²+95%
  2. Pen accuracy (centre)±0.3 mm vs ±0.5 mm+67%
  3. Screen size21.5″ vs 15.4″+40%

Why is U1600 better than Kamvas 22?

  1. Pixel density102 ppi vs 143 ppi+40%
  2. Weight3.9 kg vs 1.32 kg3×
Specifications

Side by side

Huion Kamvas 22Huion Kamvas 22≈ $3204.7
Display
Screen size21.5″15.4″
Resolution1920 × 10801920 × 1080
Resolution classFull HDFull HD
Pixel density102 ppi143 ppi
Aspect ratio16:9—
Panel typeIPS—
Brightness (typical)220 nits220 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,000:1
Response time14 ms—
Anti-glare / matte screenYes—
Fully laminated screenNo—
Colour
Colour depth8 bit—
Pen & controls
Pressure levels8,1928,192
Tilt recognition±60°±60°
Active area476.6 × 268.1 mm341 × 192 mm
Active area width477 mm341 mm
Active area height268 mm192 mm
Active area (surface)1,278 cm²655 cm²
Pen resolution5,080 lpi5,080 lpi
Report rate220 RPS—
Pen accuracy (centre)±0.3 mm±0.5 mm
Battery-free penYesYes
Pen with eraser—Yes
PenPW517—
Multi-touchNoNo
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)Yes—
Wireless connectionNoNo
CompatibilityWindows, macOS, Linux, Android—
Design & ergonomics
StandAdjustable Stand 20°~80°—
Weight3.9 kg1.32 kg
Width546 mm402 mm
Height323 mm263 mm
Depth19 mm—
Product lineHuion Kamvas—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare