How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. Kamvas RDS-160 vs U1600

Huion Kamvas RDS-160 vs UGEE U1600

What Kamvas RDS-160 does better (2) and where U1600 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Huion Kamvas RDS-160
Huion · 2023Kamvas RDS-160
7.7Score
2 advantages≈ $460
Higher score
vs
UGEE U1600
UGEE · 2023U1600
5.8Score
0 advantages
3.2Screen3.0
6.3Pen & controls3.6
6.2Connectivity4.6
7.4Design & ergonomics6.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Kamvas RDS-160U1600
423.5 × 25312402 × 263
Kamvas RDS-160U1600Difference
Height253 mm263 mm−10 mm
Width423.5 mm402 mm+21.5 mm
Weight1.3 kg1.3 kg−0.1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Kamvas RDS-160 better than U1600?

  1. Pen accuracy (centre)±0.3 mm vs ±0.5 mm+67%
  2. Weight1.26 kg vs 1.32 kg+5%

Why is U1600 better than Kamvas RDS-160?

U1600 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size15.5″15.4″
Resolution1920 × 10801920 × 1080
Resolution classFull HDFull HD
Pixel density142 ppi143 ppi
Aspect ratio16:9—
Panel typeIPS—
Brightness (typical)220 nits220 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,000:1
Response time25 ms—
Anti-glare / matte screenYes—
Fully laminated screenYes—
Colour
Colour depth8 bit—
Pen & controls
Pressure levels8,1928,192
Tilt recognition±60°±60°
Active area344.2 × 193.6 mm341 × 192 mm
Active area width344 mm341 mm
Active area height194 mm192 mm
Active area (surface)666 cm²655 cm²
Pen resolution5,080 lpi5,080 lpi
Report rate220 RPS—
Pen accuracy (centre)±0.3 mm±0.5 mm
Battery-free penYesYes
Pen with eraser—Yes
PenPW517—
Express keys10—
Multi-touchNoNo
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)Yes—
HDMI inputs1—
Wireless connectionNoNo
CompatibilityWindows, macOS, Android—
Design & ergonomics
StandFoldable Stand ST300 20°/45°—
Weight1.26 kg1.32 kg
Width424 mm402 mm
Height253 mm263 mm
Depth12 mm—
Product lineHuion Kamvas—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare