How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. Kamvas RDS-160 vs One 13 Touch

Huion Kamvas RDS-160 vs Wacom One 13 Touch

What Kamvas RDS-160 does better (3) and where One 13 Touch wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Huion Kamvas RDS-160
Huion · 2023Kamvas RDS-160
7.4Score
3 advantages≈ $460
Higher score
vs
Wacom One 13 Touch
Wacom · 2023One 13 Touch
1 advantage≈ $430
7.4Design & ergonomics8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Kamvas RDS-160One 13 Touch
423.5 × 25312336 × 22212
Kamvas RDS-160One 13 TouchDifference
Height253 mm222 mm+31 mm
Width423.5 mm336 mm+87.5 mm
Depth12 mm12 mm=
Weight1.3 kg0.9 kg+0.4 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Kamvas RDS-160 better than One 13 Touch?

  1. Pressure levels8,192 vs 4,0962×
  2. Active area (surface)666 cm² vs 426 cm²+56%
  3. Screen size15.5″ vs 12.9″+20%

Why is One 13 Touch better than Kamvas RDS-160?

  1. Weight1.26 kg vs 0.9 kg+40%
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size15.5″12.9″
Resolution1920 × 1080—
Resolution classFull HD—
Pixel density142 ppi—
Aspect ratio16:9—
Panel typeIPS—
Brightness (typical)220 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1—
Response time25 ms—
Anti-glare / matte screenYes—
Fully laminated screenYes—
Colour
Colour depth8 bit—
Pen & controls
Pressure levels8,1924,096
Tilt recognition±60°—
Active area344.2 × 193.6 mm294 × 145 mm
Active area width344 mm294 mm
Active area height194 mm145 mm
Active area (surface)666 cm²426 cm²
Pen resolution5,080 lpi—
Report rate220 RPS—
Pen accuracy (centre)±0.3 mm—
Battery-free penYes—
PenPW517—
Express keys10—
Multi-touchNo—
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)Yes—
HDMI inputs1—
Wireless connectionNo—
CompatibilityWindows, macOS, Android—
Design & ergonomics
StandFoldable Stand ST300 20°/45°—
Weight1.26 kg0.9 kg
Width424 mm336 mm
Height253 mm222 mm
Depth12 mm12 mm
Product lineHuion Kamvas—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare