- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- Cintiq 22 vs DTK-1660E
Wacom Cintiq 22 vs Wacom DTK-1660E
What Cintiq 22 does better (4) and where DTK-1660E wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Cintiq 22DTK-1660E
| Cintiq 22 | DTK-1660E | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 359 mm | 285 mm | +74 mm |
| Width | 570 mm | 422 mm | +148 mm |
| Depth | 40 mm | 24.5 mm | +15.5 mm |
| Weight | 5.6 kg | 1.9 kg | +3.7 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Cintiq 22 better than DTK-1660E?
- Multi-touchYes · DTK-1660E: No
- Active area (surface)1,276 cm² vs 666 cm²+92%
- Screen size21.5″ vs 15.5″+39%
- Response time22 ms vs 25 ms+14%
Why is DTK-1660E better than Cintiq 22?
- Pixel density102 ppi vs 142 ppi+39%
- Weight5.6 kg vs 1.9 kg2.9×
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 21.5″ | 15.5″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 102 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness (typical) | 210 nits | 210 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | 22 ms | 25 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Pen & controls | ||
| Pressure levels | 8,192 | 8,192 |
| Tilt recognition | ±60° | — |
| Active area | 476 × 268 mm | 344.2 × 193.6 mm |
| Active area width | 476 mm | 344 mm |
| Active area height | 268 mm | 194 mm |
| Active area (surface) | 1,276 cm² | 666 cm² |
| Pen resolution | 5,080 lpi | — |
| Pen accuracy (centre) | — | ±0.5 mm |
| Battery-free pen | Yes | — |
| Dials, wheels & touch rings | 1 | — |
| Multi-touch | Yes | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | No | No |
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| Wireless connection | No | No |
| Compatibility | Windows, macOS | Windows, macOS |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Weight | 5.6 kg | 1.9 kg |
| Width | 570 mm | 422 mm |
| Height | 359 mm | 285 mm |
| Depth | 40 mm | 24 mm |
| Product line | Wacom Cintiq | — |
