- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- DTH-2452 vs DTK-1660E
Wacom DTH-2452 vs Wacom DTK-1660E
What DTH-2452 does better (0) and where DTK-1660E wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is DTH-2452 better than DTK-1660E?
DTH-2452 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is DTK-1660E better than DTH-2452?
- Pressure levels2,048 vs 8,1924×
- Weight7.4 kg vs 1.9 kg3.9×
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 15.5″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD | Full HD |
| Pixel density | — | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness (typical) | 210 nits | 210 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | — | 25 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | — | Yes |
| Pen & controls | ||
| Pressure levels | 2,048 | 8,192 |
| Active area | — | 344.2 × 193.6 mm |
| Active area width | — | 344 mm |
| Active area height | — | 194 mm |
| Active area (surface) | — | 666 cm² |
| Pen resolution | 2,540 lpi | — |
| Pen accuracy (centre) | — | ±0.5 mm |
| Multi-touch | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | No | No |
| HDMI inputs | — | 1 |
| Wireless connection | No | No |
| Compatibility | — | Windows, macOS |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Weight | 7.4 kg | 1.9 kg |
| Width | — | 422 mm |
| Height | — | 285 mm |
| Depth | — | 24 mm |
