- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- DTK-1660E vs One 13
Wacom DTK-1660E vs Wacom One 13
What DTK-1660E does better (5) and where One 13 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
DTK-1660EOne 13
| DTK-1660E | One 13 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 285 mm | 225 mm | +60 mm |
| Width | 422 mm | 357 mm | +65 mm |
| Weight | 1.9 kg | 1 kg | +0.9 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is DTK-1660E better than One 13?
- Pressure levels8,192 vs 4,0962×
- Brightness (typical)210 nits vs 200 nits+5%
- Active area (surface)666 cm² vs 488 cm²+36%
- Screen size15.5″ vs 13.3″+17%
- Response time25 ms vs 26 ms+4%
Why is One 13 better than DTK-1660E?
- Pixel density142 ppi vs 166 ppi+17%
- Pen accuracy (centre)±0.5 mm vs ±0.01 mm50×
- Weight1.9 kg vs 1 kg+90%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.5″ | 13.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 166 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness (typical) | 210 nits | 200 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | 25 ms | 26 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Pen & controls | ||
| Pressure levels | 8,192 | 4,096 |
| Tilt recognition | — | ±60° |
| Active area | 344.2 × 193.6 mm | 294 × 166 mm |
| Active area width | 344 mm | 294 mm |
| Active area height | 194 mm | 166 mm |
| Active area (surface) | 666 cm² | 488 cm² |
| Pen resolution | — | 2,540 lpi |
| Pen accuracy (centre) | ±0.5 mm | ±0.01 mm |
| Battery-free pen | — | Yes |
| Multi-touch | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | No | No |
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| Wireless connection | No | No |
| Compatibility | Windows, macOS | Windows, Android, ChromeOS |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Weight | 1.9 kg | 1 kg |
| Width | 422 mm | 357 mm |
| Height | 285 mm | 225 mm |
| Depth | 24 mm | — |
| Product line | — | Wacom One |
