How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. DTK-1660E vs Pen Display 24

Wacom DTK-1660E vs Xencelabs Pen Display 24

What DTK-1660E does better (1) and where Pen Display 24 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Wacom DTK-1660E
Wacom · 2020DTK-1660E
3.8Score
1 advantage≈ $1,150
vs
Xencelabs Pen Display 24
Xencelabs · 2023Pen Display 24
5.4Score
4 advantages≈ $1,350
Higher score
2.3Screen9.3
2.6Pen & controls3.7
5.7Design & ergonomics3.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

DTK-1660EPen Display 24
422 × 28524.5618 × 38834.7
DTK-1660EPen Display 24Difference
Height285 mm388 mm−103 mm
Width422 mm618 mm−196 mm
Depth24.5 mm34.7 mm−10.2 mm
Weight1.9 kg6 kg−4.1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is DTK-1660E better than Pen Display 24?

  1. Weight1.9 kg vs 6 kg3.2×

Why is Pen Display 24 better than DTK-1660E?

  1. Pixel density142 ppi vs 185 ppi+30%
  2. Brightness (typical)210 nits vs 330 nits+57%
  3. Active area (surface)666 cm² vs 1,563 cm²2.3×
  4. Screen size15.5″ vs 23.8″+54%
Specifications

Side by side

Wacom DTK-1660EWacom DTK-1660E≈ $1,1503.8
Display
Screen size15.5″23.8″
Resolution1920 × 10803840 × 2160
Resolution classFull HD4K UHD
Pixel density142 ppi185 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPS—
Brightness (typical)210 nits330 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1—
Response time25 ms—
Anti-glare / matte screenYes—
Pen & controls
Pressure levels8,1928,192
Tilt recognition—±60°
Active area344.2 × 193.6 mm527 × 296.5 mm
Active area width344 mm527 mm
Active area height194 mm296 mm
Active area (surface)666 cm²1,563 cm²
Pen resolution—5,080 lpi
Pen accuracy (centre)±0.5 mm—
Battery-free pen—Yes
Express keys—3
Multi-touchNoNo
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)No—
HDMI inputs1—
Wireless connectionNo—
CompatibilityWindows, macOSWindows, macOS, Linux
Design & ergonomics
Weight1.9 kg6 kg
Width422 mm618 mm
Height285 mm388 mm
Depth24 mm35 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare