- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- Pen Tablet Medium vs Deco 640
Xencelabs Pen Tablet Medium vs XP-Pen Deco 640
What Pen Tablet Medium does better (1) and where Deco 640 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.5Pen & controls7.0
4.7Connectivity4.7
2.7Design & ergonomics9.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pen Tablet MediumDeco 640
| Pen Tablet Medium | Deco 640 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 232 mm | 150 mm | +82 mm |
| Width | 320 mm | 188.3 mm | +131.7 mm |
| Depth | 8 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 0.7 kg | 0.2 kg | +0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pen Tablet Medium better than Deco 640?
- Active area (surface)387 cm² vs 144 cm²2.7×
Why is Deco 640 better than Pen Tablet Medium?
- Pressure levels8,192 vs 16,3842×
- Weight0.71 kg vs 0.17 kg4.2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Pen & controls | ||
| Pressure levels | 8,192 | 16,384 |
| Tilt recognition | ±60° | ±60° |
| Active area | 262.4 × 147.4 mm | 160 × 90 mm |
| Active area width | 262 mm | 160 mm |
| Active area height | 147 mm | 90 mm |
| Active area (surface) | 387 cm² | 144 cm² |
| Pen resolution | — | 5,080 lpi |
| Report rate | — | 220 RPS |
| Battery-free pen | Yes | Yes |
| Pen with eraser | Yes | — |
| Pen | — | P01(16K) |
| Express keys | — | 8 |
| Multi-touch | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless connection | No | No |
| Compatibility | Windows, macOS | Windows, macOS, Android |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Weight | 0.71 kg | 0.17 kg |
| Width | 320 mm | 188 mm |
| Height | 232 mm | 150 mm |
| Depth | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Product line | — | XP-Pen Deco |
Related comparisons
vs
Wacom Intuos MediumvsXencelabs Pen Tablet Medium
4.13.6
vs
Xencelabs Pen Tablet MediumvsXP-Pen Deco Pro LW (Gen 2)
vs
Xencelabs Pen Tablet MediumvsHuion Inspiroy Dial 2
3.66.8
vs
Xencelabs Pen Tablet MediumvsXP-Pen Deco 01 V3
3.65.3
vs
Xencelabs Pen Tablet MediumvsHuion Inspiroy 2 L
3.64.7
vs
Xencelabs Pen Tablet MediumvsHuion Inspiroy HS611
3.65.7