- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- XMCTBMJPKR-SE vs Deco Pro LW (Gen 2)
Xencelabs XMCTBMJPKR-SE vs XP-Pen Deco Pro LW (Gen 2)
What XMCTBMJPKR-SE does better (0) and where Deco Pro LW (Gen 2) wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
Dimensions
Size comparison
XMCTBMJPKR-SEDeco Pro LW (Gen 2)
| XMCTBMJPKR-SE | Deco Pro LW (Gen 2) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 232 mm | 258 mm | −26 mm |
| Width | 320 mm | 333 mm | −13 mm |
| Depth | 8 mm | 10.7 mm | −2.7 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is XMCTBMJPKR-SE better than Deco Pro LW (Gen 2)?
XMCTBMJPKR-SE has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Deco Pro LW (Gen 2) better than XMCTBMJPKR-SE?
- Pressure levels8,192 vs 16,3842×
- Active area (surface)387 cm² vs 497 cm²+28%
Specifications
Side by side
| Pen & controls | ||
| Pressure levels | 8,192 | 16,384 |
| Active area | 262.4 × 147.4 mm | 279.4 × 177.8 mm |
| Active area width | 262 mm | 279 mm |
| Active area height | 147 mm | 178 mm |
| Active area (surface) | 387 cm² | 497 cm² |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Weight | 0.71 kg | — |
| Width | 320 mm | 333 mm |
| Height | 232 mm | 258 mm |
| Depth | 8 mm | 11 mm |
