7% pricier ≈ $640
- Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,200:1
- DCI-P3 coverage 98% vs 95%
- Screen size 31.5″ vs 27″
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 163 ppi
- Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 76 Hz
Alternatives to BenQ MA270U
10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the MA270U — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the MA270U
17% pricier ≈ $700
- Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,200:1
- DCI-P3 coverage 98% vs 95%
- Weight 5.9 kg vs 8.2 kg
- Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 76 Hz
- Height adjustment 110 mm vs 115 mm
15% pricier ≈ $690
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 90 W
- Contrast ratio (static) 3,000:1 vs 1,200:1
- HDR DisplayHDR 600 vs DisplayHDR 400
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
Same price ≈ $600
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 90 W
- Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,200:1
- DCI-P3 coverage 98% vs 95%
- Pixel density 110 ppi vs 163 ppi
- HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
8% cheaper ≈ $550
- Pixel density 184 ppi vs 163 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 500 nits vs 400 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 100 W vs 90 W
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
- Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 76 Hz
18% pricier ≈ $710
- Brightness (typical) 550 nits vs 400 nits
- HDR DisplayHDR 600 vs DisplayHDR 400
- DCI-P3 coverage 97% vs 95%
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 163 ppi
- Weight 9.1 kg vs 8.2 kg
28% pricier ≈ $770
- Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 400 nits
- Response time 1 ms vs 5 ms
- Refresh rate 160 Hz vs 76 Hz
- HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 1,200:1
5% pricier ≈ $630
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 90 W
- DCI-P3 coverage 98% vs 95%
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 76 Hz
- HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
17% pricier ≈ $700
- Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,200:1
- DCI-P3 coverage 98% vs 95%
- Weight 7.6 kg vs 8.2 kg
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 15 W vs 90 W
- Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 76 Hz
Same price ≈ $590
- Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 400 nits
- Anti-glare / matte screen
- Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 76 Hz