- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- MA270U vs MA320U
BenQ MA270U vs BenQ MA320U
What MA270U does better (2) and where MA320U wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
MA270UMA320U
| MA270U | MA320U | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 560 mm | 609 mm | −49 mm |
| Width | 614 mm | 714 mm | −100 mm |
| Depth | 220 mm | 220 mm | = |
| Weight | 8.2 kg | 9.1 kg | −0.9 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MA270U better than MA320U?
- Pixel density163 ppi vs 140 ppi+16%
- Weight8.2 kg vs 9.1 kg+11%
Why is MA320U better than MA270U?
- Brightness (typical)400 nits vs 550 nits+38%
- HDRDisplayHDR 400 vs DisplayHDR 600
- DCI-P3 coverage95% vs 97%+2%
- Screen size27″ vs 31.5″+17%
- Contrast ratio (static)1,200:1 vs 1,300:1+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 27″ | 31.5″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 163 ppi | 140 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 76 Hz | 76 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 400 nits | 550 nits |
| Peak brightness (HDR) | — | 600 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,200:1 | 1,300:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 99% | 99% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 95% | 97% |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | 10 bit |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 | DisplayHDR 600 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 90 W | 90 W |
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 115 mm | 115 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | Yes |
| Swivel | Yes | Yes |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 8.2 kg | 9.1 kg |
| Width | 614 mm | 714 mm |
| Height | 560 mm | 609 mm |
| Depth | 220 mm | 220 mm |
| Product line | BenQ MA | BenQ MA |
