How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Displays & pen tablets
  3. BenQ PD3225U
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to BenQ PD3225U

10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the PD3225U — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

BenQ PD3225U
BenQ · 2024
PD3225U
31.5″3840 × 216085 W98%
approx. price≈ $1,100
8.3

Alternatives to the PD3225U

Asus ProArt PA32UCE
1
Asus · 2025ProArt PA32UCE
7.9
Same price ≈ $1,100
  • Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 400 nits
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 85 W
  • sRGB coverage 100% vs 98%
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 2,000:1
  • HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
Asus ProArt PA32QCV
2
Asus · 2025ProArt PA32QCV
8.0
6% pricier ≈ $1,150
  • Pixel density 218 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 85 W
  • sRGB coverage 100% vs 98%
  • HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
BenQ PD2730S
3
BenQ · 2025PD2730S
9.0
7% pricier ≈ $1,150
  • Pixel density 218 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 85 W
  • Refresh rate 76 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
  • Screen size 27″ vs 31.5″
Asus ProArt PA329CDV
4
Asus · 2026ProArt PA329CDV
9.1
8% pricier ≈ $1,200
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
  • Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
  • Panel type OLED vs IPS
  • Brightness (typical) 300 nits vs 400 nits
  • HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
Dell UltraSharp U3225QE
5
Dell · 2025UltraSharp U3225QE
9.4
17% cheaper ≈ $900
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 85 W
  • Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • HDR DisplayHDR 600 vs DisplayHDR 400
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
  • Weight 9.34 kg vs 8.2 kg
BenQ SW272U
6
BenQ · 2024SW272U
8.3
24% pricier ≈ $1,350
  • Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 85 W
  • sRGB coverage 100% vs 98%
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 2,000:1
  • HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
BenQ MA270S
7
BenQ · 2026MA270S
9.2
Same price ≈ $1,100
  • Pixel density 218 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 85 W
  • Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 400 nits
  • Anti-glare / matte screen
  • Screen size 27″ vs 31.5″
Asus ProArt PA279CDV
8
Asus · 2026ProArt PA279CDV
9.4
8% cheaper ≈ $1,000
  • Pixel density 166 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
  • Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
  • Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 400 nits
  • HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
Asus ProArt PA27UCGE
9
Asus · 2025ProArt PA27UCGE
9.2
31% cheaper ≈ $750
  • Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 400 nits
  • Refresh rate 160 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 2,000:1
  • HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
Asus ProArt PA32UCDM
10
Asus · 2025ProArt PA32UCDM
8.1
35% pricier ≈ $1,450
  • Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
  • Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
  • Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 400 nits
  • HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare