How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Displays & pen tablets
  3. BenQ PD3225U
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to BenQ PD3225U

10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the PD3225U — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Alternatives to the PD3225U

Asus ProArt PA32UCE
1
Asus · 2025ProArt PA32UCE
8.1
5% cheaper ≈ $1,050
  • Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 400 nits
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 85 W
  • sRGB coverage 100% vs 98%
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 2,000:1
  • HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
Dell UltraSharp U3225QE
2
Dell · 2025UltraSharp U3225QE
9.5
15% cheaper ≈ $930
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 85 W
  • Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • HDR DisplayHDR 600 vs DisplayHDR 400
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
  • Weight 9.34 kg vs 8.2 kg
Asus ProArt PA329CDV
3
Asus · 2026ProArt PA329CDV
9.1
Same price ≈ $1,050
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
  • Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
  • Panel type OLED vs IPS
  • Brightness (typical) 300 nits vs 400 nits
  • HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
BenQ PD2730S
4
BenQ · 2025PD2730S
9.2
7% pricier ≈ $1,150
  • Pixel density 218 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 85 W
  • Refresh rate 76 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
  • Screen size 27″ vs 31.5″
Asus ProArt PA32QCV
5
Asus · 2025ProArt PA32QCV
8.1
10% pricier ≈ $1,200
  • Pixel density 218 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 85 W
  • sRGB coverage 100% vs 98%
  • HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
BenQ SW272U
6
BenQ · 2024SW272U
8.4
27% pricier ≈ $1,400
  • Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 85 W
  • sRGB coverage 100% vs 98%
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 2,000:1
  • HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
BenQ PD3226G
7
BenQ · 2025PD3226G
8.2
6% pricier ≈ $1,150
  • Response time 1 ms vs 5 ms
  • Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 85 W
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,200:1 vs 2,000:1
Asus ProArt PA27JCV
8
Asus · 2025ProArt PA27JCV
8.6
23% cheaper ≈ $840
  • Pixel density 218 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 85 W
  • Weight 5.91 kg vs 8.2 kg
  • HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
Asus ProArt PA27UCGE
9
Asus · 2025ProArt PA27UCGE
9.2
29% cheaper ≈ $770
  • Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 400 nits
  • Refresh rate 160 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 2,000:1
  • HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
Asus ProArt PA279CDV
10
Asus · 2026ProArt PA279CDV
9.4
17% cheaper ≈ $900
  • Pixel density 166 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
  • Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
  • Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 400 nits
  • HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare