9% cheaper ≈ $320
- Pixel density 266 ppi vs 102 ppi
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Weight 1 kg vs 3.84 kg
- Active area (surface) 513 cm² vs 1,278 cm²
- Express keys 7 vs 8
Alternatives to GAOMON PD2200
10 pen displays at a similar price that compete with the PD2200 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the PD2200
37% pricier ≈ $480
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Pixel density 123 ppi vs 102 ppi
- Active area (surface) 1,562 cm² vs 1,278 cm²
- Report rate 220 RPS vs 266 RPS
- Weight 5.6 kg vs 3.84 kg
17% cheaper ≈ $290
- Pressure levels 16,384 vs 8,192
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Pixel density 143 ppi vs 102 ppi
- Report rate 200 RPS vs 266 RPS
- Active area (surface) 654 cm² vs 1,278 cm²
17% cheaper ≈ $290
- Pressure levels 16,384 vs 8,192
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Pixel density 142 ppi vs 102 ppi
- Active area (surface) 660 cm² vs 1,278 cm²
- Screen size 15.5″ vs 21.5″
17% cheaper ≈ $290
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Pixel density 142 ppi vs 102 ppi
- Weight 1.3 kg vs 3.84 kg
- Active area (surface) 667 cm² vs 1,278 cm²
- Screen size 15.5″ vs 21.5″
54% pricier ≈ $540
- Pressure levels 16,384 vs 8,192
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Pixel density 121 ppi vs 102 ppi
- Report rate 260 RPS vs 266 RPS
29% cheaper ≈ $250
- Pressure levels 16,384 vs 8,192
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Pixel density 143 ppi vs 102 ppi
- Active area (surface) 655 cm² vs 1,278 cm²
- Screen size 15.4″ vs 21.5″
34% cheaper ≈ $230
- Pressure levels 16,384 vs 8,192
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Pixel density 142 ppi vs 102 ppi
- Express keys 5 vs 8
- Active area (surface) 667 cm² vs 1,278 cm²
Same price ≈ $360
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 102 ppi
- Pressure levels 16,384 vs 8,192
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Active area (surface) 558 cm² vs 1,278 cm²
- Report rate 200 RPS vs 266 RPS
109% pricier ≈ $730
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Pixel density 137 ppi vs 102 ppi
- Report rate 300 RPS vs 266 RPS