6% cheaper ≈ $510
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Refresh rate 76 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Height adjustment 115 mm vs 110 mm
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,200:1 vs 2,000:1
- DCI-P3 coverage 95% vs 98%
Alternatives to LG UltraFine 32UQ850
10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the UltraFine 32UQ850 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the UltraFine 32UQ850
19% pricier ≈ $640
- Brightness (typical) 550 nits vs 400 nits
- HDR DisplayHDR 600 vs DisplayHDR 400
- Refresh rate 76 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,300:1 vs 2,000:1
- Weight 9.1 kg vs 7.2 kg
Same price ≈ $550
- Pixel density 184 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 500 nits vs 400 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 100 W vs 90 W
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,300:1 vs 2,000:1
11% pricier ≈ $600
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 90 W
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Height adjustment 155 mm vs 110 mm
- Pixel density 110 ppi vs 140 ppi
- HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
24% pricier ≈ $670
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 90 W
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
- Screen size 27″ vs 31.5″
17% cheaper ≈ $450
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 90 W
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Height adjustment 155 mm vs 110 mm
- Pixel density 109 ppi vs 140 ppi
- HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
24% cheaper ≈ $410
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Weight 5.85 kg vs 7.2 kg
- Screen size 27″ vs 31.5″
39% pricier ≈ $750
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 400 nits
- Refresh rate 160 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 2,000:1
- HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
9% cheaper ≈ $490
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 90 W
- Weight 5.78 kg vs 7.2 kg
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 2,000:1
- HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
4% pricier ≈ $560
- Brightness (typical) 410 nits vs 400 nits
- Height adjustment 155 mm vs 110 mm
- Pixel density 94 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Response time 19 ms vs 5 ms