Same price ≈ $1,400
- Pivot (portrait rotation)
- Swivel
- Screen size 49″ vs 31.5″
- Pixel density 109 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 400 nits
Alternatives to LG UltraFine 32UQ85X
10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the UltraFine 32UQ85X — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the UltraFine 32UQ85X
Same price ≈ $1,400
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Pivot (portrait rotation)
- Swivel
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 2,000:1
- HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
4% pricier ≈ $1,450
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 400 nits
- HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
16% cheaper ≈ $1,200
- Swivel
- Refresh rate 76 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Screen size 37.5″ vs 31.5″
- Pixel density 111 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 300 nits vs 400 nits
24% pricier ≈ $1,750
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Pivot (portrait rotation)
- Swivel
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 400 nits
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,300:1 vs 2,000:1
27% pricier ≈ $1,800
- Pixel density 187 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Pivot (portrait rotation)
- Swivel
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 2,000:1
- HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
20% pricier ≈ $1,700
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 90 W
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
- HDR DisplayHDR 600 vs DisplayHDR 400
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
22% cheaper ≈ $1,100
- Pivot (portrait rotation)
- Swivel
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 85 W vs 90 W
6% pricier ≈ $1,500
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
- HDR DisplayHDR 600 vs DisplayHDR 400
- Swivel
14% cheaper ≈ $1,200
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Pivot (portrait rotation)
- Swivel
- HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2